the Bicommunal conundrum is this: where is "Greek" first, and where is "Turkish" first.
...i suggest the line stays where it is and enclaves are added to the geography for the redistribution of the land, so that Two National Assemblies provide for the Citizen's displaced, and those that will be displaced, can have a sense of Justice with what is offered to them; so that in this defining act we can act as equals, in a strong central government, which defends us as Individuals, and is Sovereign in protecting our Individual Rights.
observation,comments,dialog,history: CYPRUS; UN mitigation against foreign beligerance wanes, risking cultural extinction. my militancy for this Heritance.
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Thursday, May 22, 2008
ONLY GREEK CYPRIOTS VOTE
...from a position of strength, one defines their demands, in an adversarial politic.
miltiades is suggesting that it is possible to break this viscious cycle, with a debate which seeks in its resolution, our realisation that in Principal we are not enemies, we are this island's dwellers, and in acts, a demonstration of our desire to unite in war against our own Ignorance, to better ourselves, against the enemies, Hunger, Disease, and Disaster.
GR is more brash, and practical, who in this debate represents the status quo.
that said, my comment again would be that there exists an equlibrium, which having a dynamic, moves. neither can sustain themselves alone, it seems a Law of Nature, (but the politics can change itself), and they find their function within a wider system. yet:
you choose,
by acts alone does this machination work.
_________________
Cyprus: three governments; one Capital, Free.
miltiades is suggesting that it is possible to break this viscious cycle, with a debate which seeks in its resolution, our realisation that in Principal we are not enemies, we are this island's dwellers, and in acts, a demonstration of our desire to unite in war against our own Ignorance, to better ourselves, against the enemies, Hunger, Disease, and Disaster.
GR is more brash, and practical, who in this debate represents the status quo.
that said, my comment again would be that there exists an equlibrium, which having a dynamic, moves. neither can sustain themselves alone, it seems a Law of Nature, (but the politics can change itself), and they find their function within a wider system. yet:
you choose,
by acts alone does this machination work.
_________________
Cyprus: three governments; one Capital, Free.
Saturday, May 03, 2008
One Response to “Northern Cyprus and Northern Kosovo
One Response to “Northern Cyprus and Northern Kosovo”
repulsewarrior Says: May 3rd, 2008 at 4:08 pm
…the people of Cyprus can identify themselves as Cypriots, I hope, because it is an island afterall. Like ‘Kosovo’, the history of the place is far more complex than the Interlocutors would have us imagine. I can only hope that the “easy” solution of tearing this island in two is not the agreement they come to, and as in Kosovo, my hope is that the people who share the land and its Patrimony respect the efforts of those who left this Heritance, in an effort toward betterment, embraced the change within themselves to be as Individuals united in an inclusive State, while as Persons sustaining themselves.
Bi-communal in the greater Serbian context requires the efforts of Bosnia (Herzegovina), along with Serbia, as well as Kosovo, historically, if we are to compare apples with apples. As in Cyprus, or in the Middle East (Jerusalem), the land and its identity has evolved to have many facets. Two levels of Government will successfully realise the goal of People as Nations in these context. Unlike the Nationalism which is at present demonstrating our intolerance, the Nationalism of Ataturk and the founder Napoleon III, will provide for us an identity where our distinctions add to our sense of unity, because we choose to stand together, for our attachment toward our own governance as equals and to the land’s relics.
repulsewarrior Says: May 3rd, 2008 at 4:08 pm
…the people of Cyprus can identify themselves as Cypriots, I hope, because it is an island afterall. Like ‘Kosovo’, the history of the place is far more complex than the Interlocutors would have us imagine. I can only hope that the “easy” solution of tearing this island in two is not the agreement they come to, and as in Kosovo, my hope is that the people who share the land and its Patrimony respect the efforts of those who left this Heritance, in an effort toward betterment, embraced the change within themselves to be as Individuals united in an inclusive State, while as Persons sustaining themselves.
Bi-communal in the greater Serbian context requires the efforts of Bosnia (Herzegovina), along with Serbia, as well as Kosovo, historically, if we are to compare apples with apples. As in Cyprus, or in the Middle East (Jerusalem), the land and its identity has evolved to have many facets. Two levels of Government will successfully realise the goal of People as Nations in these context. Unlike the Nationalism which is at present demonstrating our intolerance, the Nationalism of Ataturk and the founder Napoleon III, will provide for us an identity where our distinctions add to our sense of unity, because we choose to stand together, for our attachment toward our own governance as equals and to the land’s relics.
Friday, May 02, 2008
Cyprus/Turkey image: Acts; to be seen and Justice
...if there are mosques in the south
that are no more... then allow them
to be included in the shame.
of course there is
no God, and in faith there seems
to be only a Creed, and yet
your acts VP surprise me ...so dogmatic.
it is tragic because the
wealth will be divided
with what you plea
what makes our island
rich will be broken.
are you a Cypriot?
that are no more... then allow them
to be included in the shame.
of course there is
no God, and in faith there seems
to be only a Creed, and yet
your acts VP surprise me ...so dogmatic.
it is tragic because the
wealth will be divided
with what you plea
what makes our island
rich will be broken.
are you a Cypriot?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)